|
[openbeos-cdt]
||
[Date Prev]
[04-2002 Date Index]
[Date Next]
||
[Thread Prev]
[04-2002 Thread Index]
[Thread Next]
[openbeos-cdt] Re: Names
- From: "Eckard Riedenklau" <eckard.riedenklau@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: <openbeos-cdt@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 3 Apr 2002 01:36:23 +0200
----- Original Message -----
From: "Stuart McCoy" <stubear@xxxxxxxxx>
To: <openbeos-cdt@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Wednesday, April 03, 2002 1:26 AM
Subject: [openbeos-cdt] Re: Names
> This is supposed to be the name of the OS itself. At a later date we
could
> perhaps ruminate on the naming of the seperate elements of the OS but much
> like the look of the OS being derived from the identity, the names of the
> core components should be derived from the name of the OS itself.
Do you really think of renaming the OS? I think we should stick to
"OpenBeOS" becouse people can re-recognize the good old BeOS.
I will still know that OpenBeOS has a new name. But what about all the other
BeOS user who even have not heared about OBOS? How will they know that XY is
the new BeOS?
> By the way, what about "Elemental" as a name?
Sounds good. I like it. But the user could think that it is only an
elemental OS and doesn't have many abilities...
And (already said) think about the worth of re-recognition.
Greetings Eckard
|
|
