From: "Patrick Werner" <patrickw@xxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-To: leicareflex@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
To: <leicareflex@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [LRFlex] Re: Change at the top.
Date: Mon, 11 Oct 2004 08:43:07 -0400
I have a hard time imagining professional wedding photographers are
really using digital technology for their clients. I own a Sony F717
and my wife and I are both versed in photoshop and paint shop pro.
However, enlargements are problematic (quality issues). With
advancements in electronics, specifically digital technology, I should
think that this is an extremely poor time to get into digital if you are
a professional wedding photographer.
Patrick Werner
-----Original Message-----
From: leicareflex-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:leicareflex-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Jim Hemenway
Sent: Saturday, October 09, 2004 7:11 AM
To: leicareflex@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [LRFlex] Re: Change at the top.
Xavier:
I know of some wedding photographers who are close to switching back
because they are finding that they are spending twice as much time
producing prints digitally, than they did when using film.
One in particular is "up all night" using Photoshop.
Jim
Bille Xavier F. wrote:
>snip
>
> I'm waitng for the pendulum to swing back, I mean, the users of
> digital
> are not all top notch in Photoshop and they want photos which are
great.
> And they are not keen to spend money on new Hardware/Software platform
> to be able to see their pictures. So?
>
> Film is back! (in a moment....)
------
Unsubscribe or change to/from Digest Mode at:
www.horizon.bc.ca/~dnr/lrflex.htm
Archives are at:
www.freelists.org/archives/leicareflex/
------
Unsubscribe or change to/from Digest Mode at:
www.horizon.bc.ca/~dnr/lrflex.htm
Archives are at:
www.freelists.org/archives/leicareflex/
