[interfacekit] Re: Some progress in Support Kit ...
From: "Steve Vallee" <svallee@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <interfacekit@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2002 10:06:45 -0800
I didn't get the chance to read a lot about BFlattenable and BArchivable,
but I don't really understand the big difference between the two. Each one
seem to let the user to convert a class in a binary blob form, than can be
later (or elsewhere) reconverted in a real class instantiation.
What is the big difference between the two ?
(I know, the best is to read the docs, and I will ! I just want a quick
idea by people who have to deal with those classes ).
- Steve
----- Original Message -----
From: "Erik Jakowatz" <erik@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <interfacekit@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Friday, January 25, 2002 10:00 AM
Subject: [interfacekit] Re: Some progress in Support Kit ...
>
> >PFiuu ... just finished the total implementation, full testing, and
> binary
> >compatibility check for those 4 classes in the Support Kit :
> >
> >- BDataIO
> >- BPositionIO
> >- BMemoryIO
> >- BMallocIO ( *250%* faster, and more error-checking than the original
> >!!! )
>
> Awesome!
>
> >Hopefully will be done till the end of this week-end most of those
> other
> >class from Support Kit :
> >
> >- BString
> >- BList
> >- BFlattenable
> >- BArchivable
> >- BStopWatch
>
> Cool. BTW, BArchivable has already been done (by moi! ;).
>
> >After that, well, the Support Kit will be pretty much finished and
> ready to
> >ship :-) .
>
> Now that's just gonna make those progress bars look real purty. =)
>
> e
>
> Data is not information, and information is not knowledge: knowledge is
> not understanding, and understanding is not wisdom.
> - Philip Adams
>
