
|
[haiku-web]
||
[Date Prev]
[06-2006 Date Index]
[Date Next]
||
[Thread Prev]
[06-2006 Thread Index]
[Thread Next]
[haiku-web] Re: Trac (reevaluated)
- From: "Jorge G. Mare (a.k.a. Koki)" <koki@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: haiku-web@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Fri, 09 Jun 2006 01:53:47 -0700
On Fri, 2006-06-09 at 10:36 +0200, Waldemar Kornewald wrote:
> Michael Phipps wrote:
> > I honestly think that we should put off bug tracking until after we
> > redo the website.
>
> Since RailFrog is not ready and we don't have a really good alternative
> we can't
> do anything about it.
>
> > I looked at Railfrog (thanks for setting that up). I see where they
> > are going and I like it, but they aren't moving anywhere near fast
> > enough, IMHO, to be useful to us in the short/medium term.
>
> I'd like to decide this after the second coding sprint.
>
> > I honestly think that, for this iteration of the website, we have to
> > consider RailFrog to be far too immature.
>
> What is the alternative? Plone? It needs a totally new skin (less overloaded).
> Many people hate wikis, so Semantic MediaWiki will probably not be accepted.
> And that's all we have on the alternatives list.
I have a few simple questions regarding the new website:
What is driving the change of the website? In other words, what are you
trying to achieve with the new website? Is there a set of defined goals
for it? Has, for example, an outline of the content been defined?
If I somehow missed the discussion around these questions, can someone
point me to where this information is?
Thanks,
Koki
PS: I tend to agree with Michael, in that RailFrog seems to be too far
away in time to be usable.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
haiku-web@xxxxxxxxxxxxx - Haiku Web & Developer Support Discussion List
|

|