
|
[haiku-web]
||
[Date Prev]
[06-2006 Date Index]
[Date Next]
||
[Thread Prev]
[06-2006 Thread Index]
[Thread Next]
[haiku-web] Re: Trac (reevaluated)
- From: Waldemar Kornewald <wkornew@xxxxxxx>
- To: Haiku Website <haiku-web@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 09 Jun 2006 10:36:17 +0200
Michael Phipps wrote:
Maybe I am crazy... I don't honestly remember the admin group
agreeing to trac. I personally don't care much for it (although it
isn't worse than bugzilla).
There was mostly an "I don't care much, but if it makes you happy..."
position.
Bugzilla is working, for some value of work. It is ugly and
obnoxious, but bugs are getting filed. Devs are kept busy.
We want a prettified bug tracker, don't we?
Also, how do we want to manage *tasks*? Bugzilla? Are you serious?
I want to have nice status graphs and a history function that lists ticket
changes. And my biggest wish is to have a nice-looking and *easy to
use* ticket
tracker.
I honestly think that we should put off bug tracking until after we
redo the website.
Since RailFrog is not ready and we don't have a really good alternative
we can't
do anything about it.
I looked at Railfrog (thanks for setting that up). I see where they
are going and I like it, but they aren't moving anywhere near fast
enough, IMHO, to be useful to us in the short/medium term.
I'd like to decide this after the second coding sprint.
I honestly think that, for this iteration of the website, we have to
consider RailFrog to be far too immature.
What is the alternative? Plone? It needs a totally new skin (less
overloaded).
Many people hate wikis, so Semantic MediaWiki will probably not be accepted.
And that's all we have on the alternatives list.
BTW, is Bryan's secret project related to our website? Or completely
Haiku-unrelated?
Bye,
Waldemar Kornewald
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
haiku-web@xxxxxxxxxxxxx - Haiku Web & Developer Support Discussion List
|

|