
|
[gps-talkusers] e: Re: e: Re: possible suggestion
- From: robert stigile <rstigile@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: gps-talkusers@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Mon, 09 Apr 2007 07:09:03 -0700
Hello,
It would be a lot easier if you know the town name.
If you are visiting, and you don't know that the area is broken
up by towns, then it would be a lot easier if you knew the zip
code.
Regards,
Robert Stigile
----- Original Message -----
From: "Alice Dampman" <alicedh@xxxxxxxxxxx
To: <gps-talkusers@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Date sent: Mon, 09 Apr 2007 09:10:23 -0400
Subject: [gps-talkusers] Re: e: Re: possible suggestion
How about using the town names or the names of the particular
area of the
city instead of a zip code number? Map quest is not always
available, say if
you are out and about somewhere already, and it means one more
step, having
to go on the internet, look up the zip, then back to the gps.
Meanwhile...
So if you could say I want Center Street in Jamaica Plain,
which
technically is part of Boston, but still goes by this other name
rather than
having to know what the zip code for Jamaica Plain is, it would
be a lot
easier to find what you are looking for.
Alice
alicedh@xxxxxxxxxxx
----- Original Message -----
From: "robert stigile" <rstigile@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
To: <gps-talkusers@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Sunday, April 08, 2007 9:39 PM
Subject: [gps-talkusers] e: Re: possible suggestion
Hello,
I am not in favor of removing the zip code part of looking up an
address.
In fact, I am in favor of being able to look up addresses by zip
code
only. You can do this with Map Quest, and I think it would be
great to do
this with the GPS as well.
One of the problems you have with not using a zip code to look
up an
address, is that if a program is looking for that street by the
cross
street, it could potentionally find the street you are looking
on clear
across the city.
Take for instance, the street I live on. It goes across the
entire San
Fernando Valley, in Los Angeles. This street goes across
approximately 40
miles of the Valley, but never comes out to a major street.
If you do not have a zip code, it could give you the wrong area
for where
you are wanting to be.
So, as I said, I hope that the zip code is not taken out.
Thanks,
Robert Stigile
----- Original Message -----
From: "GianniP46" <giannip46@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
To: <gps-talkusers@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Date sent: Sun, 8 Apr 2007 21:27:07 -0400
Subject: [gps-talkusers] Re: possible suggestion
yes, if possible, that would be very nice. The whole zip code
thing can drive you crazy, especially that you have to start
over if you
mess up. It would be better if you could back up a prompt and
just
correct the zip code instead of doing the whole process over.
----- Original Message -----
From: kevin chao
To: gps-talkusers@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Sunday, April 08, 2007 3:30 PM
Subject: [gps-talkusers] possible suggestion
This is a possible suggestion for the way the address lookup
works. I am not
sure how hard would it be to implement or if it is possible.
But, what I was
thinking was when the GPS ask for the street name that the user
is only
required to type in the core name and won't have to pick the
zip code and
when the next field ask for the cross street or address number
then the
system can match the address or the interesection which will
eliminate, or
narrow the list of possible intersections or address that the
user will have
to scroll through. This will be more efficient compared to the
current
method of having to know the zip code information and the exact
name of the
street name.
Kevin
--
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.5.446 / Virus Database: 268.18.25/744 - Release Date:
4/3/2007
5:32 AM
Other related posts:[gps-talkusers] e: Re: e: Re: possible suggestion [gps-talkusers] e: Re: e: Re: possible suggestion [gps-talkusers] Re: e: Re: e: Re: possible suggestion [gps-talkusers] Re: e: Re: e: Re: possible suggestion
|

|

|
[ Home |
Signup |
Help |
Login |
Archives |
Lists
]
All trademarks and copyrights within the FreeLists archives are owned
by their respective owners. Everything else ©2008 Avenir Technologies, LLC.
|

|
|