|
[beports]
||
[Date Prev]
[04-2008 Date Index]
[Date Next]
||
[Thread Prev]
[04-2008 Thread Index]
[Thread Next]
[beports] Re: Ports not in Gentoo Portage
- From: Andreas Färber <andreas.faerber@xxxxxx>
- To: beports@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Fri, 18 Apr 2008 22:42:49 +0200
Hello Brecht,
Am 14.04.2008 um 10:07 schrieb Brecht Machiels:
Have you thought about what to do in the rare case that a port is not
in Gentoo Portage? WebKit is one such case. My suggestion would be to
create custom categories and to prefix such categories with x- like
IANA does; I checked this doesn't conflict with X, that's x11-.
No I haven't thought about that yet. I simply copied the Portage tree
layout as a convenience. I have wondered whether Portage has some sort
of naming convention, but I haven't been able to find anything on
that.
Personally, I would just add WebKit to the appropriate category
(net-libs?). This would keep the BePorts tree somewhat intuitive.
I've looked around some more and decided to follow your suggestion of
net-libs.
Thanks,
Andreas
--
BePorts homepage - http://tools.assembla.com/BePorts
List archives: http://www.freelists.org/archives/beports
Administrative contact: brecht@xxxxxxxxxxx
|
