FreeLists / beports / [beports] Re: Ports not in Gentoo Portage

[Andreas Färber <andreas.faerber@xxxxxx>]

Hi,

Am 17.04.2008 um 11:34 schrieb Brecht Machiels:
> On Mon, 2008-04-14 at 23:19 +0200, Andreas Färber wrote:
> > Am 14.04.2008 um 10:07 schrieb Brecht Machiels:
> > > I might have been a bit too pessimistic about Haiku's progress  
> > > when I
> > > set up the BePorts website. That's why it's not called HaikuPorts.
> > > Perhaps it's a good idea if I change the wiki pages to emphasize  
> > > Haiku
> > > ports (make Haiku the primary target)?
> > How would you do that? Reorder the table?
> It's mainly the main wiki page that requires changing... not that  
> there
> needs to be changed alot. The table could be reordered too.
Okay. I don't think the tables need to be / should be reordered.
But this does remind me of the gcc2 vs. gcc4 Haiku issue. It wouldn't  
look good in the table, so I suggest we document this further down, as  
subheadings maybe?
On another matter, on the OpenBeOS mailing list a proposal on a  
package description format for future binary Haiku Optional Packages  
has been posted. Maybe you want to take a look and see if parts can be  
merged/aligned with your BePorts format.
Andreas
--
BePorts homepage - http://tools.assembla.com/BePorts
List archives: http://www.freelists.org/archives/beports
Administrative contact: brecht@xxxxxxxxxxx