
|
[az-observing]
||
[Date Prev]
[12-2003 Date Index]
[Date Next]
||
[Thread Prev]
[12-2003 Thread Index]
[Thread Next]
[AZ-Observing] Re: 2004 All Arizona Messier Marathon
- From: Jeff Hopkins <phxjeff@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: az-observing@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2003 11:54:11 -0700
At 11:13 -0700 12/12/2003, Stanley A. Gorodenski wrote:
>Just by chance I decided to read my January issue of S&T. They have an
>article on web cams. From reading it, I am not all to sure that the
>impressive photos were taken with off the shelf web cams. My impression,
>from reading the article, is that to get good deep sky images it takes
>considerable modification, the parts costing more than the web cam
>itself. It also appears to involve some technical ability and the
>inclination to make such modifications. What do you know about this
>Jeff? Also, I beleive your Meade CCD is about $700. This is really not
>that expensive and so I am wondering if it would it be worth it, unless
>someone just wants to do it, to attempt to modify a web cam? I am
>pretty ignorant of this area.
>Stan
>
You are correct about the January S&T article. At least some of those
pictures were taken with modified web cams. However, the
modifications are very inexpensive (under $50 for parts - including a
Petlier cooler, heat sink and fan). There is a modification on some
to allow longer exposures. If you are handy with a small soldering
iron and not afraid to take the camera apart, the mods should be very
straight forward and easy.
The Meade 216XT I have is very outdated. The only feature on it I
like is the regulated cooling. It uses the same TC-255 chip you can
buy in an old $20 B&W web cam. It's small and (336 X 242 pixels) as
opposed top the 640 X 480 pixels of most of the newer web cams. I'm
about fed up with the 216XT. It is very ornery to use, takes forever
to get an image (find it, focus it, get the exposure right - figure a
couple of hours). It may have a problem or it may just be me.
I plan to test the 840k web cam in stages. First , stock with just a
focal reducer. Then perhaps with a fan, timing mod and lastly with a
cooler. If I decide to try photometry with it I will probably replace
the CCD chip with a monochrome equivalent.The beauty of these web
cams is you can take many images very fast and stack them giving you
a much higher effective sensitivity. Since most of the M objects are
not visible from Phoenix due to sky brightness, I may have to wait
for a dark sky trip to really check it out.
Jeff
--
Jeff Hopkins
HPO SOFT
*********************************************************
Small minds speak about people * Average minds speak of events
************ Great minds speak of ideas! ****************
*********************************************************
Phoenix, Arizona Atlanta, Georgia
7812 West Clayton Drive 12170 Boxwood Circle
Phoenix, AZ 85033-2439 U.S.A. Alpharetta, GA 30005 U.S.A.
(623) 849-5889 (Fax) (770) 619-3322 (Phone/Fax)
www.hposoft.com dataman.home.mindspring.com
4th Dimension Developer
FileMaker Pro Expert
BASIC/C/C++ Programmer/Web Site Developer
--
See message header for info on list archives or unsubscribing, and please
send personal replies to the author, not the list.
|

|