
|
[az-observing]
||
[Date Prev]
[12-2003 Date Index]
[Date Next]
||
[Thread Prev]
[12-2003 Thread Index]
[Thread Next]
[AZ-Observing] Re: M33's HII Regions
- From: "Jones, Jack (AZ75)" <jack.jones@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: "'az-observing@xxxxxxxxxxxxx'" <az-observing@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2003 09:56:04 -0700
He's just basically giving a tongue-in-cheeky statement there, that he's
just eyeballing it. That's the method I mostly use when I'm writing a
description although I'm not doing the "rigorous" math. My field of view on
my 9 Nag is 24', so I should be breaking it up into four quarters of 6'
bites, then break up the 6' into individual minutes. Cool! Consider that
stolen too!
Jack
>
> > Bill and Thad have described more rigorous methods, but it
> is usually
> > sufficient to just use fractions.
>
> Tom, et al,
>
> I realize that this is another method to accomplish this, but
> I have to
> comment on the above comment. (!)
> Taking a template, placing it on a sketch (Well, OK, you got
> me, sketching
> is rigorous...), and using a pencil to draw a line from that
> template is
> really not all that rigorous. It takes all of say, 3
> seconds, 5 if I have
> to find the right template. I'm not claiming that this mothod is
> easier/better/superior, just that it isn't rigorous. (If
> you're already
> doing the sketch that is...)
>
> At any rate, it's all about the observer and what works for them.
> Obviously, there is no "one-size-fits-all" method, just what
> works in each
> individual case.
>
> Thad
--
See message header for info on list archives or unsubscribing, and please
send personal replies to the author, not the list.
|

|