
|
[az-observing]
||
[Date Prev]
[11-2006 Date Index]
[Date Next]
||
[Thread Prev]
[11-2006 Thread Index]
[Thread Next]
[AZ-Observing] 2006 Sentinel/Schwar Stargaze
- From: "Steven Dodder" <sdodder@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: az-observing@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2006 22:01:48 +0000
Rosie and I attended the 2006 edition of the Sentinel/Schwarr Stargaze
held just the other side of the middle of nowhere, Arizona this weekend
past. The weather was absolutely glorious, with daytime temps in the mid
80?s and lows mid 40?s. I was very excited in that I brought along the
?new? scope my brother in law gave to me. It?s a very old 10? F/6.6 Newt on
a GEM mount marked, ?Coast Instruments?. Steve Coe tells me Coast was
bought by Meade in the early 70?s, so the scope must be at least that old.
It has some neat built in bells and whistles, such as a wooden box for
eyepieces and an apparent DC/AC converter. Unfortunately, I haven?t tried
the converter yet, and the modern ones I did try didn?t work. I spent the
weekend just star-hopping without setting circles, and still managed a
mini-Messier Marathon, plus whatever looked cool on the charts.
The observing targets were many, so I?ll just give a list and describe
some of the highlights. Messier objects included, in no particular order,
1, 27, 31, 32, 110, 33, 35, 36, 37, 38, 29, 39, 81, 82, 44, 45, 67, 57, 13,
92, 74, 77, 71, 15, 103, 93, 46, 47, 97, 108, 79, 42 and 43. Saturn was
observed when it rose and at intervals thereafter until it actually looked
good, as did Comet Swan. Some of the NGC objects I observed were, 6888,
6960, 6992, 6995, 6811, 253, 584, 586, 1035, 1042, 1052, 596, 600, 309, 255,
884, 869, 281, 3227, 2392, and 2903. There were also a number of variable
stars, dark nebulae and just general poking around the Milky Way. Jennifer
Polakis asked if I?d seen the G and H stars in the Trapezium, so we poked
around there, too. E and F were easy, G was intermittent and H was not
seen.
The highlights were M82 with Sam Herschak?s 4.7mm EP. That gives about
357X. Comparing it to the view in Sam?s 20?, the only real difference was
the brightness. All the dust lanes and mottling seen in the 20? were
present in the 10?. This kind of comment was typical throughout the night
from source after source. Mike Spooner, Bernie Sanden, Tom Polakis and
others pretty much said the same. I did enjoy Tom?s particular tome when he
said, ?Long focal length Newtonians are best for everything. Except tube
length.? Anyway, I tried M82 later with my 4mm Plossl, giving 415X and saw
about the same as the 4.7mm, although focus was trickier.
Ngc 6888, The Crescent Nebula was a pretty amazing view. Bernie and I had
tried it in his scope from Grand Canyon, but failed to see it. Could
recognize the star field, but not the nebula. May have been lack of
experience on my part, but now with a more trained eye, I was able to see
the whispy clouds.
M33 was also a highlight. Was able to see some details in the spiral
arms, where in the C8 I could just make out it was a face-on galaxy. M79
was resolved enough to tell where the core began and the outer edges
converged.
That?s the way it went pretty much both nights. I?m told it got cold, but
I couldn?t tell. It seemed to be getting late once, but I ignored it and
went on. Of course, I stopped for a moment when I got hungry-around 1am or
so. Great night. Great SCOPE!
Steve and Rosie Dodder
sdodder@xxxxxxxxxxx
Visit my web site at http://www.stargazing.net/Astroman
_________________________________________________________________
Get free, personalized commercial-free online radio with MSN Radio powered
by Pandora http://radio.msn.com/?icid=T002MSN03A07001
--
See message header for info on list archives or unsubscribing, and please
send personal replies to the author, not the list.
|

|