Go to the FreeLists Home Page Home Signup Help Login
 



[az-observing] || [Date Prev] [10-2007 Date Index] [Date Next] || [Thread Prev] [10-2007 Thread Index] [Thread Next]

[AZ-Observing] Re: Report on the Televue Diagonal

  • From: Stan Gorodenski <stanlep@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: az-observing@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Sat, 20 Oct 2007 12:20:06 -0700

Brian Skiff wrote:

>     The difference in nominal reflectivity is only 10-15% at most,
>which without having some sort of blinking arrangement, you simply
>aren't going to see visually, particularly at low power (the 35mm
>eyepiece you mention).  The eye really sucks when dealing with
>brightness differences.  Where the newer types of coating ought to
>help is with increased contrast
>

I thought I had seen this on M42 with the Televue. I could not be sure. 
I don't have a blinking arrangement and it is difficult to remember what 
one sees after having to spend the time to switch diagonals, switch the 
eyepiece, and refocus.

>---less scattered light, which should
>be noticeable in crowded fields, being able to see stuff better   
>on planets etc, all at high power.
>

Okay. It looks like I made the wrong test for the coatings. It appears I 
should be using higher magnification eyepieces to test them out.
Stan
--
See message header for info on list archives or unsubscribing, and please 
send personal replies to the author, not the list.





[ Home | Signup | Help | Login | Archives | Lists ]

All trademarks and copyrights within the FreeLists archives are owned by their respective owners.
Everything else ©2007 Avenir Technologies, LLC.