
|
[az-observing]
||
[Date Prev]
[09-2006 Date Index]
[Date Next]
||
[Thread Prev]
[09-2006 Thread Index]
[Thread Next]
[AZ-Observing] Re: NYTimes.com: Lockheed Wins Job of Building Next Spaceship
- From: Stan Gorodenski <stan_gorodenski@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: az-observing@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Sat, 02 Sep 2006 00:54:48 -0700
Since Boeing-Northrop had extensive experience in space efforts in the
past, I'm wondering if this is trickle down favoritism to cronies by
bush or cheney, especially since NASA is so tight lipped?
Stan
m24@xxxxxxx wrote:
>This page was sent to you by: m24@xxxxxxxx
>BUSINESS | September 1, 2006
>Lockheed Wins Job of Building Next Spaceship
>By WARREN E. LEARY and LESLIE WAYNE
>The NASA decision is likely to change the dynamics of the space business,
>setting Lockheed up to be the dominant player in space exploration.
>http://www.nytimes.com/2006/09/01/business/01nasa.html?ex=1157774400&en=4912380329fbe28e&ei=5070&emc=eta1
>
>
>
>----------------- Advertisement --------------------------
>
>The Academy loved these movies enough to name each
>one Best Picture. What did the original New York
>Times movie reviews have to say about these Oscar
>winning films?
>Go to the Best Pictures review archive:
>
>http://ads.nyt.com/th.ad/nytnyt-textEmailThisdefault-Center1A/academyawards_text/?_RM_REDIR_=http://www.nytimes.com/ref/movies/oscars/bestpictures.html
>
>
>
>
>----------------- Advertisement --------------------------
>
>0
>
>
>----------------------------------------------------------
>
>ABOUT THIS E-MAIL
>This e-mail was sent to you by a friend through NYTimes.com's E-mail This
>Article service. For general information about NYTimes.com, write to
>help@xxxxxxxxxxxx
>
>NYTimes.com 500 Seventh Avenue New York, NY 10018
>
>Copyright 2006 The New York Times Company
>
>
>--
>See message header for info on list archives or unsubscribing, and please
>send personal replies to the author, not the list.
>
>
>
>
>
--
See message header for info on list archives or unsubscribing, and please
send personal replies to the author, not the list.
|

|