Go to the FreeLists Home Page Home Signup Help Login
 



[az-observing] || [Date Prev] [09-2003 Date Index] [Date Next] || [Thread Prev] [09-2003 Thread Index] [Thread Next]

[AZ-Observing] Re: Image Question

  • From: Andrew Cooper <acooper@xxxxxxxxx>
  • To: az-observing@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Sun, 07 Sep 2003 18:32:46 -0700

Silicon dioxide (SiO2) and quartz are the same thing.  My first mirror
(6" f/5) I had coated with a silicon dioxide overcoat.  Despite being
almost 20 years old and having spent much of that time in a climate much
more humid than here it shows no visible degredation.  Maybe there is
some loss of reflectivity proper measurements would show but I can't see it.

I hope my 18" overcoated with titanium dioxide does as well.

Andrew


"Stanley A. Gorodenski" wrote:
> 
> My mirror has a silicon dioxide coating. That was supposed to be a good
> coating although I do not know if it was rated by years of service. I
> believe, though, that silicon dioxide affects sensitivity in certain
> wavelengths of the UBV system and that is where a quartz (?) coating is best
> for some photometry.
> Stan
> 
> Tom Polakis wrote:
> 
> > Is this true even here in Aridzona?  Other than a lot of dust, what
> > attacks coatings in this climate?  Shouldn't mirror coating last for
> > decades in the desert, or am I misinformed again?
> 
> --
> See message header for info on list archives or unsubscribing, and please
> send personal replies to the author, not the list.

-- 

Andrew Cooper
Tucson, AZ
mailto:acooper@xxxxxxxxx
http://www.whitethornhouse.com
--
See message header for info on list archives or unsubscribing, and please 
send personal replies to the author, not the list.





[ Home | Signup | Help | Login | Archives | Lists ]

All trademarks and copyrights within the FreeLists archives are owned by their respective owners.
Everything else ©2007 Avenir Technologies, LLC.