
|
[az-observing]
||
[Date Prev]
[09-2002 Date Index]
[Date Next]
||
[Thread Prev]
[09-2002 Thread Index]
[Thread Next]
[AZ-Observing] Re: Cloudy weather cause by my moistons
- From: "Matt Luttinen" <mluttinen@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: "AZ-Observing mailing list" <az-observing@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 7 Sep 2002 15:01:40 -0700
uh,
hear=here, or something, I think.
English rules.
Matt
--
This message is from the AZ-Observing mailing list. See this message's
header if you want info about unsubscribing or the list's archive.
This is a discussion list. Please send personal inquiries directly to
the message author. In other words, do not use "reply" for personal
messages. Thanks.
rom starhopper@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Sun Sep 8 04:05:59 2002
Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list az-observing); Sun, 08 Sep 2002 16:19:50
-0500 (EST)
Return-Path: <starhopper@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Delivered-To: az-observing@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Received: from mail4.cybertrails.com (mail.cybertrails.com [162.42.150.35])
by turing.freelists.org (FreeLists Mail Multiplex) with ESMTP id
9BDF494017
for <az-observing@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Sun, 8 Sep 2002 04:05:57 -0500 (EST)
Received: (qmail 46500 invoked from network); 8 Sep 2002 08:52:58 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO jennifer) ([162.42.84.84]) (envelope-sender
<starhopper@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>)
by 172.16.3.23 (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP
for <az-observing@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; 8 Sep 2002 08:52:58 -0000
Message-ID: <002401c25716$2ff55720$54542aa2@jennifer>
From: "Jennifer Keller" <starhopper@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <az-observing@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <3D7A753E.AC2CCE64@xxxxxxx>
Subject: [AZ-Observing] Re: Cloudy weather cause by my moistons
Date: Sun, 8 Sep 2002 01:59:54 -0700
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000
X-archive-position: 1819
X-Approved-By: dickson@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0
Sender: az-observing-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Errors-to: az-observing-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
X-original-sender: starhopper@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Precedence: normal
Reply-to: az-observing@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
List-help: <mailto:ecartis@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?Subject=help>
List-unsubscribe:
<mailto:az-observing-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?Subject=unsubscribe>
List-software: Ecartis version 1.0.0
List-ID: <az-observing.freelists.org>
X-List-ID: <az-observing.freelists.org>
List-subscribe: <mailto:az-observing-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?Subject=subscribe>
List-owner: <mailto:dickson@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-post: <mailto:az-observing@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-archive: <http://www.freelists.org/archives/az-observing>
X-list: az-observing
I was heading toward Vekol today anyway (kind of) so I figured I may as
well test my new theory of 60% chance of rain=40% sucker holes (since I
get 20mpg). And while that wasn't quite the case, I was able to nab
pristine views of the Ring Nebula and the M13. I wonder if it is some
phenomena that makes objects between the cloudulas so sharp or if it's
only another case of averted optimism?
----- Original Message -----
From: "Rick Scott" <rmscott@xxxxxxx>
To: "AZ Observing MLS" <az-observing@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Saturday, September 07, 2002 2:53 PM
Subject: [AZ-Observing] Cloudy weather cause by my moistons
> I have to apologize for the cloudy weather we're having this weekend and
> take responsibility for the clear skies we had all August. On August
> 1st, I took the lenses from my Lurie-Houghton telescope to California to
> have them anit-reflection coated. Because the scope was taken apart,
> there we no available moistons causing the clear August skies.
>
> Last week I reassembled the telescope with the newly coated lenses so
> the moiston count went up significantly. I then planned on taking the
> scope to Vekol tonight so that caused an exponential increase in the
> number of available moistons to the point that it even caused the severe
> storm in the Gulf of Mexico.
>
> So much for the weather. I'm looking forward to trying out the scope to
> see if I can see any improvement in the contrast and sky background when
> near the moon or bright planets. Looking at the front of scope with the
> coated lenses is really quite something as the lenses are almost
> invisible now. It almost looks as though the secondary assembly is
> floating in thin air.
>
> Rick Scott
> http://members.cox.net/rmscott
--
This message is from the AZ-Observing mailing list. See this message's
header if you want info about unsubscribing or the list's archive.
This is a discussion list. Please send personal inquiries directly to
the message author. In other words, do not use "reply" for personal
messages. Thanks.
|

|