
|
[az-observing]
||
[Date Prev]
[01-2008 Date Index]
[Date Next]
||
[Thread Prev]
[01-2008 Thread Index]
[Thread Next]
[AZ-Observing] Re: Weather in AZ
- From: gene lucas <geneluca@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: az-observing@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2008 10:51:00 -0700
Speaking of poor observing conditions.... Ol' Will Herschel moved from
one awful observing spot to another during his observing career, but did
pretty good... (He bagged the "original" Herschel 2500.....) Maybe the
40 ft mirror just sucked up all the photons ??? :>))
The big 48 inch (and other more productive scopes) were set up in his
front garden in Slough (pronounced like "Cow"), which is just down the
road from Windsor Castle near London.... 'Course in those days, there
wasn't any "light pollution" to speak of....
(AJ can fill you on in on what a "slough" or "slew" consists of, I
think....at least back in Louisiana....)
Gene Lucas
(17250)
NB, the old Observatory House and the telescope(s) are long gone, only a
placque remains on the nearby office building erected there...
Richard Harshaw wrote:
>I don't know, AJ. But then, don't forget Gumperson's Inverse Square Law of
>New Optical Systems, which states that when an amateur buys a new optical unit
>(telescope, finder scope, eyepiece, binos, etc.) that there will be awful
>seeing centered on his location for a radius in km equal to the square of the
>aperture of the gizmo in cm; this awful seeing will continue for as many days
>as cm of the objective.
>Example: AJ buys a new 20 cm scope. He can expect to have 20 nights of bad
>seeing, and this mess will cover a circle 400 km in radius centered over AJ's
>house.
>Friedrich von Gumperson developed this law after living next to William
>Herschel for thirty years.
>DH (tongue in cheek)
>
>
--
See message header for info on list archives or unsubscribing, and please
send personal replies to the author, not the list.
|

|