
|
[az-observing]
||
[Date Prev]
[01-2007 Date Index]
[Date Next]
||
[Thread Prev]
[01-2007 Thread Index]
[Thread Next]
[AZ-Observing] Re: Comet McNaught in the evening
- From: "Jimmy Ray" <jimmy_ray@xxxxxxx>
- To: <az-observing@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 7 Jan 2007 19:30:01 -0700
I'll just tag that "Non-observation" on to the end of my Comet challenge =
observing list that won me an "Honorable Mention" for my other notable =
"Non-observations" of comets... :-)
Jimmy Ray
-----Original Message-----
From: az-observing-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:az-observing-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of AJ Crayon
Sent: Sunday, January 07, 2007 6:52 PM
To: az-observing@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Cc: Jimmy Ray
Subject: [AZ-Observing] Re: Comet McNaught in the evening
Jimmy, yes, correct, right on! That is a reasonable response for not =
seeing something. Reason why it wasn't seen, especially when it was =
expected to be visible, is always in good taste.
Clear skies,
aj
---- Jimmy Ray <jimmy_ray@xxxxxxx> wrote:=20
> The thin veil of high clouds sitting on the western horizon pretty =
well
> obscured a chance of seeing any object (Comet, planet, star) that =
would have
> been within a few degrees of the horizon. Venus was about as low as =
you
> could go before you were in the soup...
>=20
> I guess that observation counts as "Nothing seen" (Mr. Crayon?)
>=20
> Jimmy Ray
>
--
See message header for info on list archives or unsubscribing, and =
please=20
send personal replies to the author, not the list.
--
See message header for info on list archives or unsubscribing, and please
send personal replies to the author, not the list.
|

|