In message <4e21d54147Artworks@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Richard Underwood <Artworks@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 04 May, Martin Wuerthner <lists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>> "Integral" is a great idea - very much to the point and probably
>> easier to understand than "coincident".
>
> For what its worth, I'm not so sure that it is easier to understand
> because an integral arrowhead potentialy sounds like a particular type of
> arrowhead (mathematical?) rather than the behaviour of the arrowheads.
Yes, this is probably where "integrated" wins over "integral" - sounds
less like a specific technical term.
Martin
--
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Martin Wuerthner MW Software lists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
---------------------------------------------------------------------
