Le 13/12/2007, "Graeme Gill" <graeme@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> a écrit:
>> Ok. Do I also need to patch dispcal? or is this function used by both
>> dispwin and dispcal programs?
>
>It's common code, but since I imagine the photo frame doesn't
>have Video LUTs, dispcal not going to be relevant.
Yes, you're right!
>The idea would be to just make a profile, and then use
>something like imdi/cctiff to transform the raster images.
That was my idea.
--
Frédéric
