Go to the FreeLists Home Page Home Signup Help Login
 



Browse argyllcms: This Month's ArchiveMain Archive PageRelated postsPrevious by DateNext by Date

[argyllcms] Re: FW: Re: Question regarding gamut mapping for photographic images

  • From: Graeme Gill <graeme@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: argyllcms@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2005 16:15:00 +1000
Greg Sullivan wrote:

I've just been reading some of the earlier messages about this gamut mapping
issue. In the message below, I really do not get the impression that Argyll
maps the source gamut to the extremeties of the destination gamut. The main reason for my doubt is the mention of applying a "modest saturation
enhancement". To me this doesn't mean the same thing as mapping the
extremeties. :)

The "modest saturation enhancement" refers to increasing saturation beyond what is achieved by mapping the source gamut to match the destination, ie. "enhanced" rather than just "maintain" the relative saturation of colors within a gamut.

Graeme Gill.


Other related posts:

  • [argyllcms] FW: Re: Question regarding gamut mapping for photographic images
  • [argyllcms] Re: FW: Re: Question regarding gamut mapping for photographic images
  • [argyllcms] Re: FW: Re: Question regarding gamut mapping for photographic images
  • [argyllcms] Re: FW: Re: Question regarding gamut mapping for photographic images
  • [argyllcms] Re: FW: Re: Question regarding gamut mapping for photographic images
  • [argyllcms] Re: FW: Re: Question regarding gamut mapping for photographic images
  • [argyllcms] Re: FW: Re: Question regarding gamut mapping for photographic images




  • [ Home | Signup | Help | Login | Archives | Lists ]

    All trademarks and copyrights within the FreeLists archives are owned by their respective owners.
    Everything else ©2008 Avenir Technologies, LLC.