Browse argyllcms: This Month's Archive • Main Archive Page • Related posts • Previous by Date • Next by Date

[argyllcms] Re: Whitepoint difference Argyll vs ProfileMaker and ProofMaster

From: Graeme Gill <graeme@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: argyllcms@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Date: Sat, 21 Apr 2007 09:29:10 +1000

marcel nita wrote:

Did you specify the "-o" option? If I remember correctly, versions <=
0.60 use the J&V 1978_2 observer by default, and not the 1931_2. Use
"profile ... -o 1931_2 ..." to create standard compliant profiles. In
0.70 the default has changed and is now 1931_2.

Actually, I don't believe it matters in this case. I have seen while
debugging  that no options are considered when converting to Lab from
spectral.


I think Gerhard's explanation is likely to be correct. The selected observer
is passed to make_output_icc(), and hence to new_xsp2cie().

Graeme Gill.

Follow-Ups:

[argyllcms] Re: Whitepoint difference Argyll vs ProfileMaker and ProofMaster
From: marcel nita

References:
- [argyllcms] Whitepoint difference Argyll vs ProfileMaker and ProofMaster
  - From: marcel nita
- [argyllcms] Re: Whitepoint difference Argyll vs ProfileMaker and ProofMaster
  - From: Gerhard Fuernkranz
- [argyllcms] Re: Whitepoint difference Argyll vs ProfileMaker and ProofMaster
  - From: marcel nita

Other related posts:

[argyllcms] Whitepoint difference Argyll vs ProfileMaker and ProofMaster

[argyllcms] Re: Whitepoint difference Argyll vs ProfileMaker and ProofMaster