Go to the FreeLists Home Page Home Signup Help Login
 



Browse argyllcms: This Month's ArchiveMain Archive PageRelated postsPrevious by DateNext by Date

[argyllcms] Re: Argyll DeviceLinks under CC lic / Blackgeneration

  • From: Graeme Gill <graeme@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: argyllcms@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Mon, 04 Feb 2008 17:24:32 +1100
Gerhard Fuernkranz wrote:

Was possibly not a good idea to adopt the -L95 from the ISOcoated_v2_eci
profile. But I'm still wondering, why the device link created with -L95
started limiting already at 85 and not at 95.

The black channel limit is a bit of a hack, so it's possible
that this (or the fact that the sum is interpolated between
forward clut nodes) is causing this. Setting a value below
100 also results in a big slowdown as well :-(

Graeme Gill.

Other related posts:

  • [argyllcms] Re: Argyll DeviceLinks under CC lic / Blackgeneration
  • [argyllcms] Re: Argyll DeviceLinks under CC lic / Blackgeneration
  • [argyllcms] Re: Argyll DeviceLinks under CC lic / Blackgeneration
  • [argyllcms] Re: Argyll DeviceLinks under CC lic / Blackgeneration
  • [argyllcms] Re: Argyll DeviceLinks under CC lic / Blackgeneration
  • [argyllcms] Re: Argyll DeviceLinks under CC lic / Blackgeneration
  • [argyllcms] Re: Argyll DeviceLinks under CC lic / Blackgeneration
  • [argyllcms] Re: Argyll DeviceLinks under CC lic / Blackgeneration




  • [ Home | Signup | Help | Login | Archives | Lists ]

    All trademarks and copyrights within the FreeLists archives are owned by their respective owners.
    Everything else ©2008 Avenir Technologies, LLC.