
|
[argyllcms]
||
[Date Prev]
[01-2008 Date Index]
[Date Next]
||
[Thread Prev]
[01-2008 Thread Index]
[Thread Next]
[argyllcms] Re: Spyder2Pro vs Spyder3Elite
- From: lee scratchy <leescratchy@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <argyllcms@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 4 Jan 2008 00:28:02 +0000
many ppl use the i1 display lt/2 units with beamers on HCFR...I think he meant
with the manufacturer's software ;)
I plan on doing it with my HC3100 within a few days.
hopefully in -qh it won't take 90 mins anymore, considering the i1 is more
sensitive than the s2
I'm discussing your feedback on the HCFR meter with the ppl that built it at
the moment, I'll get back to you shortly
Thanks for all,
-Maxime
> Date: Fri, 4 Jan 2008 11:02:04 +1100
> From: graeme@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> To: argyllcms@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [argyllcms] Re: Spyder2Pro vs Spyder3Elite
>
> Frédéric Mantegazza wrote:
> > Argyll :o/ I bought a i1 display 2, but it does not work on the beamer
> > (the program fails after reading all patches, unable to compute the
> > profile).
>
> If this is using Argyll, then I'm interested to know how it fails,
> and to get a copy of the -D output of the failed run.
>
> Graeme Gill.
>
_________________________________________________________________
Express yourself instantly with MSN Messenger! Download today it's FREE!
http://messenger.msn.click-url.com/go/onm00200471ave/direct/01/
|

|