
|
[arachne]
||
[Date Prev]
[09-2005 Date Index]
[Date Next]
||
[Thread Prev]
[09-2005 Thread Index]
[Thread Next]
[arachne] Re: My Gopher Hole
- From: "Greg Mayman" <gmone@xxxxxxxxxx>
- To: arachne@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2005 09:15:54 +0930
Arachne at FreeLists---The Arachne Fan Club!
On Mon, 26 Sep 2005 01:55:52 -0500, Samuel W. Heywood wrote:
> I had never heard the story that the translation committee assembled
> under appointment by King James I had included the Apocrypha in the first
> edition. All of the editions of the King James Version translation that
> I have seen are purported to be the "authorized" version of 1611, i.e.,
> the version "authorized" by King James I. None of them include the
> Apocrypha.
I believe that is correct.
> According to a Roman Catholic nun who was my school teacher when I was
> in the eighth grade, all of the translations of the Bible authorized by
> the then current pope and all past pontiffs of the Roman Catholic Church
> include the Apocrypha. Of course she was of the opinion that all the
> popes are much better qualified than a king of England to determine which
> books ought to be included in a translation of the Bible. Was she wrong
> about her understanding of history that King James I did not want to
> include the Apocrypha?
But the Council of Nicaea in 325 threw out a lot of "heretic" books and
defined what should be included in the Bible.
I have no information about these so-called heretic books, but I believe
that the book of James may have been one of them.
. ,-./\ from Greg Mayman, in Adelaide, South Australia
. / \ "Queen City of The South" 34:55 S 138:36 E
. \_,-*_/
. v homepage http://users.tpg.com.au/gmone/index.htm
Arachne at FreeLists
-- Arachne, The Web Browser/Suite for DOS and Linux --
|

|