
|
[arachne]
||
[Date Prev]
[09-2004 Date Index]
[Date Next]
||
[Thread Prev]
[09-2004 Thread Index]
[Thread Next]
[arachne] Re: arachne Digest V2 #292
- From: "Greg Mayman" <gmone@xxxxxxxxxx>
- To: arachne@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2004 08:48:18 +0930
Arachne at FreeLists---The Arachne Fan Club!
On Mon, 27 Sep 2004 06:02:25 -0800, Ray Andrews wrote:
>> Again we come up with the same problem: you'd have to make a
>> DEBUG version of every new core.
> That's no problem, since the code in question would be conditional
Whoops! I meant to say EVERYONE would have to make a debug
version for every core...
> Yes, it is easy to see what's happening and I continue to find new
> ways to play with it, for example, in case of trouble with arachne.cfg,
> one can rename config.bat >> arachne.cfg and Arachne is quite happy to
Are you sure you mean config.BAT? I have doubts that a batch file
would work as a cfg, or vice versa.
> Yup, I'm sure most of us have done this sort of thing. With
> CONFIG.LOG the process is much simpler since all extranious material is
> gone, and the options are always listed in the same order, so there are
> no differences between two copies of the log which aren't
> significant.
Yes, I can see how that would help a lot!!!!
> Shall I send you a copy for your evaluation?
Since I am already testing an experimental core from glennmcc, I
could use it only as an external utility.
But thanks anyway.
. ,-./\ from Greg Mayman, in Adelaide, South Australia
. / \ "Queen City of The South" 34:55 S 138:36 E
. \_,-*_/
. v homepage http://users.tpg.com.au/gmone/index.htm
Arachne at FreeLists
-- Arachne, The Web Browser/Suite for DOS and Linux --
|

|