
|
[arachne]
||
[Date Prev]
[05-2008 Date Index]
[Date Next]
||
[Thread Prev]
[05-2008 Thread Index]
[Thread Next]
[arachne] Re: DOS only or?
- From: "Ray Andrews" <randrews@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: arachne@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Thu, 08 May 2008 20:18:08 -0800
Arachne at FreeLists---The Arachne Fan Club!
On Thu, 8 May 2008 22:41:14 -0400 (EDT), Steve <steve@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Steve,
> I think that's more indicative that DOS simply can't do everything
> people need it to do.
Absolutely correct. But that only reinforces my point -- even though they
need Linux and use it. They still keep DOS around. Why? Obviously
because it still has its merits.
> So... *most* unix/Linux users are not also DOS users even though it
> might seem so judging by the microcosm of this mailing list. ;-)
But I didn't claim that, I claimed the opposite -- that most DOS
users are Linux users.
Anyway, I'm now retiring from work on Arachne and it's long past time
I took another stab at Linux or BSD. What would you recomend?
Debian or Ubuntu sound good to me. I've also liked what I hear
about Slackware. Then there's BSD ...
I like things simple, functional, reliable, understandable and
*very* well documented. I've heard that the documentation with
Gentoo is fantastic. Glitz, pizzazz and whoop-de-doo showmanship
I don't want. And I tend to like to do things in the most
direct way even if it's superficialy a bit more difficult.
Regards,
Ray Andrews
.
-- Arachne;A3;1d
Arachne at FreeLists
-- Arachne, The Premier GPL Web Browser/Suite for DOS --
|

|