FreeLists / arachne / [arachne] Re: Alternate browser usages

["Ron Clarke" <ariadne@xxxxxxxxxx>]

Arachne at FreeLists---The Arachne Fan Club!

Hi Folks,

On Mon, 05 Mar 2007 17:24:36 -0500, Glenn McCorkle wrote:

> Sorry... I should have been more plain.

> What I mean is to run unzip.exe without the -d d:\ command line options.

> However.... I havwe a feeling that the DOS version of unzip.exe
> is still not going to do the job for you.

> I think that you may need to use WinZip to extract zipslack.zip
> so that it can re-build the LFNs and the very deeply nested dior
> stucture.

> As to FAT16 vs FAT32...... no problem there.

> The problem simply seems to be the incapability of LFN and deep dirs
> via 'pure DOS' programs.

  And yet, I was able to make a zipslack installation just fine with
pkunzip v2.50 on a FAT16 system.  But I was using zipslack.zip from
Slackware 4.0 - not the same one Greg is having so much fun with.

Regards,
         Ron


Ron Clarke
AUSREG Consultancy      http://www.ausreg.com
Tadpole Tunes           http://www.tadpoletunes.com
-- This mail was written by a user of the Arachne Browser - http://arachne.cz/
                  Arachne at FreeLists                  
-- Arachne, The Premier GPL Web Browser/Suite for DOS --