Browse arachne: This Month's Archive • Main Archive Page • Related posts • Previous by Date • Next by Date
[arachne] Re: OS advocacy

From: "Udo Kuhnt" <048321887-0001@xxxxxxxxxxx>
To: arachne@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Date: Thu, 02 Feb 2006 09:42:41 +0000
Arachne at FreeLists---The Arachne Fan Club!

>> So how do you uninstall a component that you have *not* installed with
>> PKG or RPM? Let's say you have compiled it yourself, then your
>> "removepkg" trick would only remove the source directory. I am not
>> impressed. ;-)

>   Just cd to the directory where the software was compiled and make
> uninstall.  Works for me.

I usually delete the source code directory after I have installed
something.

>> Ah, but that is just calling a script that does the mounting for you.
>> This does not invalid my argument. Also, you still do not have anything
>> like "A:" in your system because your floppy disk is now a part of your
>> root partition. No matter how you try to do it, Linux simply does not
>> support mounting two separate root devices.

>   chroot ?

Just checked the man page on chroot; this seems to do something
different than add another root partition...

>> And since everything is one
>> drive, you do not have separate working directories for each logical
>> drive like in DOS, either. :-)

>   One can install and operate across several partitions for a single
> installation, and some folks prefer that.

And some people prefer switching to another drive by just typing e:
<return> or hitting ALT-F2 in their Norton Commander and landing in the
same directory they last used on that drive.

>> Well, if Linux wants to be a replacement for the PC OS, it will have to
>> be compatible with it. And I would never replace DOS with anything that
>> cannot even run my PC software natively.

>   I, also, will always keep using DOS, like you mostly because I want to keep
> using the perfectly good DOS software that I have - and that includes
> Arachne.  But I will also keep using Linux, and I am thoroughly enjoying the
> learning experience.

Yes, that is also the reason why I added DOSLinux to my system - I
wanted to learn something about the OS that others were talking about.
And, of course, I wanted to see what Wine looked like in its native
environment, so I could decide whether it was worth to continue to work
on a DOS port.

But IMO, there should be no need to have more than one OS, and if I
would have to choose one, I would use only DOS. I am not happy with
having to run Linux for the purposes I need it for, and I cannot say I
am enjoying the Linux experience. That, of course, is due to the fact
that I have already been using DR-DOS before, so I always compare every
other OS to it.

>> The idea behind my project is it make DR-DOS the best OS for as many PCs
>> as possible, not to leave as many users as possible behind. If the
>> proportion of 64-bit machines increases, it will of course also support
>> this. However, there is no point in making it 64-bit *only*.
>> Nonetheless, it already supports 64-bit file operations.

>   Your project does sound interesting.  Is it a complete "download and
> install" setting, or is it just add-ons to an existing DR-DOS installation. I
> didn't fully understand it from your website.

It is a replacement for certain files in the standard DR-DOS
distributions, and currently only targeted at users who know DR-DOS.
Someone was working on a live CD with an installer, but he has vanished
without a trace.

>   I did try DR-DOS just a few months ago, but it did not run half my DOS
> software properly, so I took it out again.  If you are improving on it, I am
> certainly interested.

Well, the key word is "enhancement", so you can bet that I will try to
improve it. :-)

Regards,

Udo

-- The DR-DOS/OpenDOS Enhancement Project - http://www.drdosprojects.de

-- This mail was written by a user of The Arachne Browser - http://arachne.cz/
                  Arachne at FreeLists                  
-- Arachne, The Premier GPL Web Browser/Suite for DOS --
Follow-Ups:

[arachne] Re: OS advocacy
From: Jason Dodd
[arachne] Re: OS advocacy

Other related posts:
