Agreed Tristram, and if its thought that I believe a truly portable, on the
move, ocr reading device could be had for a couple of hundred quid, then I'd
like it known that I definitely do not think that price tag will will ever
be seen for something like the KNFB device.
If it were to come in for less than 2k then I would think that would be a
price that begins to look more affordable and, dare I say it 'fair' although
I know to well that fairness doesn't enter into the equation of the pricing
of commercially produced products, even when a US charity/VI rights group is
involved, as appears to be the case here.
From Ray
I can be contacted off-list at:
mailto:ray-48@xxxxxxxx
-----Original Message-----
From: access-uk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:access-uk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of
Tristram Llewellyn
Sent: 01 August 2006 4:20PM
The problem of being able to OCR from a picture taken with a normal camera
like in the KNFB Reader has occupied some very clever people in Kurzweils
research arm for quite a number of years in researching and developing this
technology. Whilst it is almost inneviable that others may try to get into
this market you are not very likely to find a £200 competitor to what has
only just presently been brought to market this year in the form of KNFB
reader in the very immediate future.
Regards.
Tristram Llewellyn
Sight and Sound Technology
Technical Support
www.sightandsound.co.uk
----- Original Message -----
From: Chipmunks
To: access-uk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Tuesday, August 01, 2006 2:07 PM
Subject: [access-uk] Re: TALKING PICTURES
I think a little while ago, I read about a phone being marketed in
Korea came with ocr. Of course, I have no idea how it compares to the
Kurzweil Reader.
Doris
At 01:49 PM 8/1/2006 +0100, you wrote:
>Just had a look at the KNFB portable reader and it's very
>impressive. However, a sighted colleague has raised an interesting
>point. If we have phones which can talk and which have cameras on
>them, how long will it be and what would it take before they can do
>the same thing at a much smaller cost? Any thoughts?
>
>http://www.bbc.co.uk/
