
|
[24hoursupport]
||
[Date Prev]
[02-2003 Date Index]
[Date Next]
||
[Thread Prev]
[02-2003 Thread Index]
[Thread Next]
[24hoursupport] AMD/Intel questions
- From: "Ron Allen" <chizotz@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: 24hoursupport@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Tue, 04 Feb 2003 01:25:06 -0600
I'm looking at possibly building a new system soon, and am, for the first=
time, seriously considering an AMD processor.
I have some questions.
First, I understand that the CPU performance when comparing AMD to Intel is=
not directly related to the clock speed. In other words, a 2GHz P4 does=
not give the same, or roughly the same, performance as an AMD at the same=
clock speed. AMD CPUs seem to be rated at how their performance compares=
to the clock speed of Intel CPUs. IOW, an Athlon 2400+ is supposed to=
perform at least as well as an Intel CPU running at a clock speed of=
2.4GHz, yet the actual Athlon clock speed is significantly lower. Have I=
got this straight?
Second, I notice that the top of the line P4 motherboards have 400MHz bus=
speeds, and support up to 533MHz FSB speed. The bus and FSB speeds on top=
of the line Athlons are much lower, as in 266MHz bus, 333 FSB. Even if the=
Athlon outperforms the P4 in raw CPU clock speed, this seems like a=
significant bottleneck in Athlon systems as compared to P4 systems to me.=
Comments? Explanations?
Third, in Intel based systems a major bottleneck has always been the amount=
of L2 cache. When a manufacturer wants to make more money on a system, it=
seems like the first thing they cut is L2 cache even though increased L2=
cache can increase overall system performance greatly. I am amazed and=
perplexed that I see no references to L2 cache when looking at Athlons at=
all. What's the story folks?
Fourth, the motherboards I'm looking at for the Athlon all have VIA=
chipsets, except one that has an SiS chipset. I've heard some bad stories=
about VIA chipsets and graphics cards, specifically the GeForce line. I=
will definitely have a GeForce4 or, if I wait to do this long enough,=
whatever the next model is, and don't want any nasty surprises. Anyone=
know about these issues and how big a concern they are? From what I=
gather, nVidia is basing all of their development around an Intel chipset,=
which of course I can't get if I go with an Athlon.
Fifth, I've seen mentioned some additional problems with VIA chipsets=
becoming unstable with certain combinations of DDR RAM and other=
flakiness. That bothers me too. Anyone have any information about that?
All this is making me wonder if I really want to go with an AMD CPU after=
all. It's cheaper, there is no question, but the tradeoffs sure seem to be=
adding up to me here.
I have more questions, but that's enough for now :)
Thanks,
Ron
- Users can unsubscribe from this list by sending email to
24hoursupport-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the
Subject field OR by logging into the Web interface at
http://webpages.charter.net/chizotz/
|

|